The Purpose of Art: Intelligent Dialogue or Mere Decoration?

Main Article Content

Jeannine Belgodere

Abstract

This article includes a presentation of the Chiricahua Apache sculptors Allan Houser
and his son Bob Haozous, as well as a synthesis of two interviews I conducted with
Bob Haozous in Santa Fe, New Mexico, in July 2013 and 2014. In this interview,
upon which I will comment when I feel necessary, Bob Haozous voices his opinion
of his father’s artwork, which, to his mind, conveys a romanticized view of Native
Americans. According to him, Allan Houser’s portrayal of dignified and beautiful
Indians cannot be divorced from a specific economic and political context. He also
critiques the Indian Market as being the portrait of a romanticized history. Indeed,
art that reflects the real plight of Natives is missing from the works exhibited at
Indian markets, especially the one that is held in August in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
For Bob Haozous, Native artists should use art as both an internal dialogue and as
a political statement. His particular view of Indian identity as a philosophy, and not
as a genetically-determined identity, is also groundbreaking, as is his artistic critique
of Indians who have become ‘cultural zombies.’

Article Details

How to Cite
Belgodere, J. . (2023). The Purpose of Art: Intelligent Dialogue or Mere Decoration?. Anafora, 3(2), 243–256. Retrieved from https://naklada.ffos.hr/casopisi/index.php/anafora/article/view/174