AN INTERCULTURAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PERSIAN AND AMERICAN EMBODIMENT PROVERBS INCLUDING DOUBLE SENSORY ORGANS

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper explores Persian and American embodiment proverbs including at least two main sensory body organs in each proverb. The aim of this research was to examine the frequency, framing, speech act functions, and figurative parts of proverbs related to embodiment proverbs including at least two sensory body organs. Data were collected from the Persian and the American Dictionary of Proverbs. The data analysis showed that the framing of American proverbs is more gain-framing than loss-framing or avoidance-framing, but the framing of Persian proverbs is more avoidance-framing than gain-framing or loss-framing. The speech act functions of Persian and American proverbs are indirect advice and statements. The results showed that the figurative parts of both Persian and American embodiment proverbs include more metaphors than metonymy. Finally, the frequency of American proverbs which included at least two sensory body organs, was higher than Persian proverbs. The results showed that the human body parts ‘hand’ and ‘eye’ as the sensory organs can be considered the most important and most salient body parts used more than other sensory body organs in Persian or American proverbs.


 

Article Details

Keywords:
American proverb, Persian proverb, embodiment proverbs, sensory body organ, framing, speech act function, figurative part
How to Cite
Sharifrad, A. “AN INTERCULTURAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PERSIAN AND AMERICAN EMBODIMENT PROVERBS INCLUDING DOUBLE SENSORY ORGANS”. Proverbium - Yearbook, vol. 41, no. 1, July 2024, pp. 73-100, doi:10.29162/pv.41.1.529.

References

Barcelona, Antonio. “Introduction: the cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy”. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, edited by Antonio Barcelona, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000a, pp. 1–28.

Barcelona, Antonio. “On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor”. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, edited by Antonio Barcelona, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000b, pp. 31–58.

Brdar-Szabó, Rita, Arezoo Sharifrad and Hani Abumathkour. “Intercultural Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Proverbs”. Diligence brings delight: A Festschrift in honour of Anna T. Litovkina on the occasion of her 60th birthday (Proverbium Online Supplement 2), edited by Hrisztalina Hrisztova-Gotthardt, Melita Aleksa Varga, and Wolfgang Mieder, 2023, pp. 279-296, https://naklada.ffos.hr/knjige/index.php/ff/catalog/view/14/17/37, retrieved on 22 June 2024.

Elahe Qomsheie, Mahdi. Quran. Sura Zelzal, verses 7 and 8, Payam Edalat press, 2020, p. 599.

Firman Alamsyah Mansyur, and Ratna Said. “A Cognitive Semantics Analysis of Wolio Proverbs Related to the Human Body”. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Proceedings of the 1st Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities, Economics, and Social Sciences (BIS-HESS 2019), vol. 436, 2019, 259-262.

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Halprin, Daria. “The expressive body in life, art, and therapy”. Working with handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 247-261.

Heine, Bernd. “The Body in Language: Observations from Grammaticalization”. The Body in Language. Brill 2014, pp. 11-32, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274297_003, retrieved on 10 December 2023.

Jamshidipour Yousuf. A dictionary of Persian proverbs. Iran Foroughi Publications, 1968.

Kövecses, Zoltán, and Radden, Günter. "”Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View”. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 9. no 1, 1998, pp. 37–77.

Kövecses, Zoltán. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2002.

Kövecses, Zoltán. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Lakoff, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphor We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 980.

Maalej, Ziad A., and Ning Yu (eds). Embodiment via Body Parts: Studies from Various Language and Cultures. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011.

Manasia, Maria Gabriela. “Polysemy and Metaphor in the Verbs of Perception”. Proceedings Of Harvard Square Symposium, The Future of Knowledge, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 1, April 29-30, 2016, pp. 55-64.

Mieder, Wolfang, Kingsbury Stewart, and Harder Kelsie B. A dictionary of American proverbs. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Nippold, Marilyn. A., Stephanie. A. Martin, and Barbara. J. Erskine. “Proverb comprehension in context: A developmental study with children and adolescents”. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, vol. 31. no. 1, 1988, pp.19–28. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3101.19, retreived on 10 December 2023.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Günter Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999.

Sharifi, Shahla, and Ebrahimi Shima. Assessing Speech Acts of Curses and Prayers in Persian. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 2, no. 9, 2012, pp. 1911-1916. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.9.1911-1916.

Sharifrad, Arezoo. “A Comparative Study on Persian and American Proverbs Including Double Main Perception Verbs”. New Horizons in English Studies, vol.9, 2024, in press.

Yu, Ning. “Metaphor from body and culture”. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, edited by R. W. Gibbs, Jr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 247–261.