ARE PROVERBS CLICHÉ? AN APPLICATION OF THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL TO FOLKLORIC PERFORMANCE

Contenu principal de l'article

Heather A. Haas

Résumé

Although proverbs resemble clichés in the broad sense of being common fixed-form phrases, and have been considered to be clichés by some scholars, proverbs are not prototypically cliché in other ways. Most importantly, whereas clichés are generally presumed to tarnish communicative efforts, the invocation of proverbs may often be an effective rhetorical act. It is here proposed that whether a particular text, in this case a proverb, is perceived as cliché may depend as much on contextual factors surrounding the performance of the text as on the familiarity of the text itself. The Elaboration Likelihood Model, which grew out of the persuasion literature in social psychology, describes two different routes to persuasion. Analysis with respect to the ELM suggests that proverb performances may be successful either because they provide useful arguments (i.e., by way of the central route) or because they exploit any of a number of heuristic truth cues (i.e., by way of the peripheral route); in either case, a successful performance is unlikely to be deemed cliché. Proverb performances that fail, however, may be deemed cliché—either because the arguments they present fail or because heuristic cues (e.g., their commonness) result in rejection of the message without consideration of its merits. The likelihood of these outcomes, though, may depend as much on the type of processing used by the audience as it does on the invocation of the proverbial text itself. 

Details de l'article

Comment citer
Haas, H. A. . « ARE PROVERBS CLICHÉ? AN APPLICATION OF THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL TO FOLKLORIC PERFORMANCE ». Proverbium, vol. 33, nᵒ 1, août 2016, p. 193-242, https://naklada.ffos.hr/casopisi/index.php/proverbium/article/view/740.

Références

Aaker, J.L., & Maheswaran, D. (1997). The effect of cultural orientation on persua-sion. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 315-328.

Abrahams, R.D. (1968). Introductory remarks to a rhetorical theory of folklore. The Journal of American Folklore, 81, 143-158.

Abrahams, R.D. (1972). Proverbs and proverbial expressions. In R.M. Dorson (Ed.), Folklore and folklife: An introduction (pp. 117-127). Chicago: Universi-ty of Chicago Press.

Albig, W. (1931). Proverbs and social control. Sociology and Social Research, 15,527-535.

American Medical Association. (2007). AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors (10th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.:

APA. Arewa, E.O., & Dundes, A. (1964). Proverbs and the ethnography of speaking folk-lore. American Anthropologist, 66(6, Pt. 2), 70-85.

Arora, S.L. (1984). The perception of proverbiality. Proverbium, 1, 1-38. Axelrod, R.B., & Cooper, C.R. (2013). The St. Martin’s guide to writing (10th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Bacon, F.T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252.

Bain, R. (1939). Verbal stereotypes and social control. Sociology and Social Re-search, 23, 431-446.

Basgoz, I. (1990). Proverbs about proverbs or folk definitions of proverb. Proverbi-um, 7, 7-17.

Begg, I., & Armour, V. (1991). Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 23, 195-213.

Begg, I., Armour, V., & Kerr, T. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadi-an Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 199-214.

Benjafield, J., Frommhold, K., Keenan, T., Muckenheim, R., & Mueller, D. (1993). Imagery, concreteness, goodness, and familiarity ratings for 500 proverbs sampled from the Oxford Dictionary of English Proverbs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(1), 27-40.

Berman, L.A. (1990). Using proverbs to test readiness for college composition. Proverbium, 7, 19-36.

Brundage, S.B., & Brookshire, R.H. (1995). A system for scoring proverb interpre-tations provided by non-brain-damaged adults and aphasic adults. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 165-177.

Chung, H., & Zhao, X. (2003). Humor effect on memory and attitude: Moderating role of product involvement. International Journal of Advertising, 22, 117-144.

Coker, A., & Coker, O. (2008). The paradox of the modern legal system in Yoruba proverbs. Proverbium, 25, 47-58.

Copperud, R.H. (1970). American usage: The consensus. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Cunningham, D.M., Ridley, S.E., &

Campbell, A. (1987). Relationship between proverb familiarity and proverb interpretation: Implications for general prac-tice. Psychological Reports, 60, 895-898.

Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1995). Idiomatic expressions and their role in the organization of topic transition in conversation. In M. Everaert, E. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspec-tives (pp. 117-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dundes, A. (1975). On the structure of the proverb. Proverbium, 25, 961-973.

Furnham, A. (1987). The proverbial truth: Contextually reconciling and the truth-fulness of antonymous proverbs. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,6, 49-55.

Gibbs, R.W., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 133-154.

Goldfine, R.R., & King, G.M. (1994). Never at a loss for words: Why do clichés live on? ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 51(3), p. 338-350.

Goodwin, P.D., & Wenzel, J.W. (1979). Proverbs and practical reasoning: A study in socio-logic. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 289-302.

Haas, H.A. (2002). Extending the search for folk personality constructs: The dimen-sionality of the personality-relevant proverb domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 594-609.

Haas, H.A. (2008). Proverb familiarity in the United States: Cross-regional compar-isons of the paremiological minimum. Journal of American Folklore,121(481), 319-347.

Haas, H.A. (2011). The wisdom of wizards—and muggles and squibs: Proverb use in the world of Harry Potter. Journal of American Folklore, 124(492), 29-54.

Haas, H.A. (2013). If it walks like a proverb and talks like a question: Proverbial and other formulaic interrogatives. Proverbium, 30, 19-50.

Haas, H.A., & Rouse, S.V. (2012). If it walks like a duck: Construct validation of proverb-based personality dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences,52, 458-461.

Haberer, A. (2005-2006). A defence of the cliché. Journal of English Studies, 5,139-153. Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112.

Haynes, R.M., Resnick, P.J., Dougherty, K.C., & Althof, S.E. (1993, Fall). Proverb familiarity and the mental status exam. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 57(4), 523-528.

Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. New York: Random House.

Higbee, K.L., & Millard, R.J. (1983, summer). Visual imagery and familiarity rat-ings for 203 sayings. American Journal of Psychology, 96(2), 211-222.

Hirsch, E.D., Jr., Kett, J.F., & Trefil, J. (1988). The dictionary of cultural literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Hulme, F.E. (1902). Proverb lore. London: Elliot Stock.

Kemper, S. (1981). Comprehension and the interpretation of proverbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 179-198.

Kirkpatrick, B. (1996, July). Cliches: Neither a defence nor a condemnation. English Today, 12(3), 16-24.

Lau, K.J. (1996). “It’s about time”: The ten proverbs most frequently used in news-papers and their relation to American values. Proverbium, 13, 135-159.

Lau, K.J., Tokofsky, P.I., & Winick, S.D. (2004). What goes around comes around:The circulation of proverbs in contemporary life. Logan, UT: Utah State Uni-versity Press.

Litovkina, A.T. (1996). Conducting a paremiological experiment in Hungary. Proverbium, 13, 161-183.

McGlone, M.S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (1999). The Keats heuristic: Rhyme as reason in aphorism interpretation. Poetics, 26, 235-244.

McGlone, M.S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorism. Psychological Science, 11, 424-428.

McKernan, J. (1988). The writer’s handbook. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Win-ston, Inc.

Messenger, J.C., Jr. (1959). The role of proverbs in a Nigerian judicial system. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 15, 64-73.

Mieder, W. (1993). Proverbs are never out of season: Popular wisdom in the mod-ern age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mieder, W. (2000). “A man of fashion never has recourse to proverbs”: Lord Ches-terfield’s tilting at proverbial windmills. Folklore, 111, 23-42.

Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Mieder, W. (2005). Proverbs are the best policy: Folk wisdom and American poli-tics. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Mieder, W. (2012). Think outside the box: Origin, nature, and meaning of modern Anglo-American proverbs. Proverbium, 29, 137-196.

Mieder, W., Kingsbury, S.A., & Harder, K.B. (1992). A dictionary of American proverbs. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mieder, B., & Mieder, W. (1977). Tradition and innovation: Proverbs in advertising. Journal of Popular Culture, 11, 308-319.

Miller, E., & Villarreal, J.J. (1945). The use of clichés by four contemporary speak-ers. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 31, 151-155.

Nietzsche, F. (1887/2006). The gay science. (T. Common, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover.

Nippold, M.A. (1998). Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Norrick, N.R. (1985). How proverbs mean: Semantic studies in English proverbs. Berlin: Mouton. Obelkevich, J. (1988). Proverbs and social history. In P. Burke & R. Porter (Eds.), The social history of language (pp. 43-72). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Olson, G.A. (1982). Clichés: Error recognition or subjective reality? College Eng-lish, 44(2), 190-194.

Ong, W. (1999). Orality, literacy, and modern media. In D. Crowley & P. Heyer (Eds.), Communication in History: Technology, Culture, Society (3rd ed., pp. 60-67). New York: Longman.

Orwell, G. (1968). Politics and the English language. In O. Orwell & I. Angus (Eds.). The collected essays, journalism, and letters of George Orwell: In frontof your nose (1945-1950), IV (pp. 127-140). New York: Harcourt Brace Jo-vanovich.

Partridge, E. (1942). Usage and abusage: A guide to good English. New York: Harper & Brothers.Partridge, E. (1966). A dictionary of clichés with an introductory essay (4th edition, reprinted with some additions). New York: Macmillan.

Penn, N.E., Jacob, T.C., & Brown, M. (1988). Familiarity with proverbs and per-formance of a black population on Gorham’s Proverbs Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66(3), 847-854.

Permyakov, G.L. (1979). From proverb to folk-tale: Notes on the general theory of the cliché (Y. N. Filippov, Trans.). Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.

Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and con-temporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Co.Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persua-sion (pp. 123-205). In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Orlando: Academic Press.

Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies (pp. 41-72). In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, New York: Guilford. Petty, R.E., Wheeler, S.C., & Bizer, G.Y. (1999). Is there one persuasion process ormore? Lumping versus splitting in attitude change theories. Psychological In-quiry, 10(2), 156-163.

Pickrel, P. (1985). Identifying clichés. College English, 47(3), 252-261.

Poon, C.S.K., & Koehler, D.J. (2006). Lay personality knowledge and dispositionistthinking: A knowledge-activation framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 177-191. Rank, H. (1984). A few good words for clichés. The English Journal, 73(5), 45-47.

Ricks, C. (1984). The force of poetry. New York: Oxford University/Clarendon Press.

Skinner, B.F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

Skinner, B.F. (1980). Notebooks: B.F. Skinner. R. Epstein (Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Suhor, C. (1975). Clichés: A re-assessment. College Composition and Communica-tion, 26(2), 159-162.

Taylor, A. (1931). The proverb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Teigen, K.H. (1986). Old truths or fresh insights? A study of students’ evaluations of proverbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 43-49.

Tellegen, A., & Waller, N.G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construc-tion: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In G.J. Boyle, G. Matthews, and D.H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of personality the-ory and testing: Vol. II. Personality measurement and assessment (pp. 261-292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2000). Processing alternative explanations of behavior: Correction or integration? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,344-354.

Wanzer, M.B., Frymier, A.B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instruction humor and student learning: Instructional humor pro-cessing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1-18.

Webster’s dictionary of English usage. (1989). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

Whiting, B. J. (1932). The nature of the proverb. Harvard studies and notes in phi-lology and literature, 14, 273-307.

Wilson, K., & Wauson, J. (2010). The AMA handbook of business writing: The ultimate guide to style, grammar, usage, punctuation, construction, and for-matting. New York: American Management Association.

Young, D.G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’srole in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11, 119-142.

Zhang, Y., & Zinkhan, G.M. (2006). Responses to humorous ads: Does audience involvement matter? Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 113-127.